use case
Assemble applications from records you already hold.
Most of what a funding application asks for already exists somewhere in the Nation. The work is finding it, and proving it.
the problem
Every application starts from zero.
Applications are typically rebuilt each cycle, with the same organizational details, financial statements and supporting evidence assembled again by hand.
Evidence is scattered
Audited statements, resolutions, contribution agreements and letters sit in different places.
Deadlines compress the work
Applications are assembled under time pressure, which is where errors enter.
Institutional detail is re-keyed
The same Nation profile information is retyped into every portal.
the process
How it runs in Tsen’awt.
The application becomes an assembly task against the record rather than a research project.
Draft in Office
The narrative is written inside the environment, attached to the programme it targets.
Evidence attached by reference
Statements, resolutions and agreements are linked from Files, not copied.
Internal approval routed
Review and sign-off run as a workflow with each approval recorded.
Submission filed
The final package, submission date and portal reference are retained as a record.
what it uses
The parts involved.
This process is built from parts of the platform working together.
Office
Drafting the narrative and financial tables.
Files
Supplying and retaining the supporting evidence.
Automated Workflows
Routing internal review and recording approval.
Calendar
Tracking the application deadline and its dependencies.
outcome
What it changes.
Applications get stronger and cost less to produce.
Faster assembly
Supporting evidence is located in minutes rather than days.
Fewer errors
Figures and details come from the record instead of memory.
Reusable submissions
Each application becomes the starting point for the next.
next step
Bring this into your Nation.
We start with an assessment of how your departments already work, then bring that work into the environment one area at a time.